User talk:Jean-Jacques MILAN

Bienvenue sur Commons, Jean-Jacques MILAN!

Les premiers pas Le tutoriel des premiers pas et la FAQ peuvent énormément vous aider. Ils expliquent comment personnaliser votre interface (pour la langue par exemple), comment importer des fichiers, sans oublier les licences. Des compétences techniques ne sont pas indispensables. Soyez clair et présumez des bonnes intentions des autres. C'est un wiki - rien de très compliqué. Obtenir de l'aide Plus d'informations sont disponibles sur le portail communautaire. Vous pouvez posez des questions sur le service d'aide, le Bistro, ou encore sur IRC, au canal #wikimedia-commons. Vous pouvez également contacter un administrateur sur sa page de discussion.		Outils et astuces Indiquez par Babel les langues que vous maitrisez, ainsi que vos compétences infographiques Toutes vos importations de fichiers sont visibles sur votre galerie. Signez vos messages sur les discussions en tapant ~~~~ Utilisez CommonSense pour trouver les bonnes catégories pour vos fichiers. Pour créer un lien vers un fichier, tapez : `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, cela donne : `Image:Foo.jpg` Si vous importez des fichiers d'un autre projet (comme Wikipédia), utilisez l' outil prévu pour. Vous avez fait une erreur ? Voulez-vous renommer un fichier ? Importez simplement l'autre fichier et écrivez sur l'ancien : `{{bad name\|LE NOUVEAU NOM CORRECT}}` Pour plus d'informations, lisez les règles de suppression
(P.S. Vous pouvez émettre une critique ou un commentaire sur ce message de bienvenue)

flower unknown

Pour moi, cela ressemble fort à Gentianella germanica , qu'en penses-tu ? Jeffdelonge 06:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unknown DSC 4924 wiki.jpg

Celle-la à Gentiana asclepiadea

Salut !

Je me méfie toujours des fleurs « exotiques » mais celles-ci ne le sont pas beaucoup. Je suis d'accord avec tes déterminations, surtout la seconde qui ne fait guère de doute, mais il y a apparemment plusieurs petites gentianes ciliées qui peuvent se ressembler.

Meilleurs voeux pour 2007 ! Jean-Jacques MILAN 11:14, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gloriosa

Gloriosa a été listé dans les demandes de suppression pour que la communauté puisse discuter afin d'établir si ce fichier peut être conservé ou non. Nous aimerions que vous participiez à cette discussion, qui se déroule dans le paragraphe consacré à cette question.

Si vous êtes la personne qui a créé ce fichier, prenez bien note que le fait qu'il soit soumis à cette procédure ne signifie pas nécessairement que nous n'accordons pas de valeur à votre travail. Cela veut simplement dire qu'une personne croit qu'un problème précis se pose au sujet de ce fichier, comme par exemple un problème de copyright. Si le fichier est listé ainsi en raison de la mise en ligne d'une meilleure version disponible, considérez que bien que le fichier puisse être supprimé, votre travail (que nous apprécions à sa juste valeur) continue d'exister au travers de la nouvelle version.

Dans tous les cas, ne prenez pas cette procédure comme une attaque personnelle. Merci ! Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 16:28, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Système optique image virtuelle.svg

Bonjour à vous,

La discussion se poursuit ici.

Louperivois Ψ @ 17:31, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Hypergonar.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Hypergonar.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Polarlys 00:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Tireuse Supercontact Volomat.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tireuse Supercontact Volomat.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Polarlys 00:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Projecteur SFOM 860.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Projecteur SFOM 860.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. Polarlys 00:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Josephine_Baker_4.jpg

I would appreciate your input to the recent deletion request, see Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Josephine_Baker_4.jpg Fernande 14:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that this image is not in the public domain in France ... Jean-Jacques MILAN 17:40, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photo sur la photo

Salut Jean-Jacques, j'ai vu ton mot sur le Bistro disant que tu passais en revue toutes les nouvelles photos pour ton wikibook. Je ne sais pas si ça t'aide, mais je peux te signaler Image:Webcam astrophotography 2007 09 15.jpg que j'ai uploadée récemment et qui montre un montage avec caméra vidéo pour l'astrophoto. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour l'info ! Les techniques de photographie astronomique me sont pour l'instant étrangères et je serais heureux que tu puisses contribuer à enrichir le wikilivre sur ce point. J'ai d'ailleurs créé le chapitre ad hoc, mais il est vide pour l'instant .

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN 21:44, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moi-même je ne suis pas experte mais je tanne mon mari (User:Gil-Estel), qui a beaucoup lu sur le sujet (et qui pratique aussi, je te rassure), pour qu'il contribue sur WP. Peut-être qu'un bout de wikibook le motiverait. Sinon il y a aussi User:Lviatour, qui a même connu l'époque héroïque de l'astrophotographie argentique. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Compte tenu de l'ambiance qui règne dans certains secteurs de WP, les WL sont des havres de paix où l'on peut enfin travailler sérieusement. Je vais tâcher dès que j'aurai le temps de mettre une ébauche en place pour ce chapitre.

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN 23:53, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Héhé, mon mari s'est déclaré intéressé. Il y a de l'espoir ! Jastrow (Λέγετε) 14:00, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alors il faut le mettre au boulot tout de suite pendant que c'est chaud ;-)) Jean-Jacques MILAN 14:02, 1 December 2007 (UTC)== Image:Canon Demi EE 17.jpg == català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−[reply]

Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 01:36, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blender 2.45 screenshot.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Blender 2.45 screenshot.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Damian Yerrick (☎) 16:26, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Astrophoto II

Salut Jean-Jacques. D'abord, bonne année à toi ! Je continue le forcing pour un Wikibook d'astrophoto. Mon mari a commencé une galerie sur le modèle des tiennes qui regroupe des photos ayant trait de près ou de loin au sujet. Certaines des photos pourront peut-être t'intéresser : User:Gil-Estel/Astro. Sinon, il écrirait volontiers une section sur les différentes aberrations optiques (coma, astigmatisme, aberrations chromatiques et j'en passe). Est-ce qu'il y a déjà une partie dans ton wikibook à ce sujet ? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 12:11, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Une excellente année à toi aussi et à tous ceux qui te sont chers, la santé avant tout, c'est sûrement le plus précieux. En plus de la page sur l'astrophotographie j'en ai commencé une autre sur les aberrations mais il y a encore beaucoup de travail à faire sur ce sujet. C'est finalement un travail de fou que j'ai entrepris avec ce livre de photo mais les choses avancent finalement assez vite et de nombreux encouragements confortent mon envie de continuer. Ce n'est pas comme sur WP où les querelles lamentables continuent.

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN 12:44, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photos techniques

Comme tu l'auras constaté, je m'essaie en ce moment à la photo d'objets technique. Est-ce que tu aurais des besoins particuliers ? Je pense prendre en photo tous mes boîtiers et objectifs absents de Commons, des accessoires (poignée d'alimentation, pare-soleils, quelques filtres, convertisseurs, trépied et rotule) ainsi que des détails comme la baïonnette d'un objectif pour monture Nikon F, la monture elle-même, l'« interrupteur » d'un objectif stabilisé, etc. Est-ce que tu aurais d'autres idées ? Jastrow (Λέγετε) 16:24, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai vu ça, en fait je m'efforce d'intégrer dans le livre ce qui me tombe sous la main et donc tout est bon, dans la mesure où je suis présent sur tous les fronts ! Tu peux inclure sans problème des images dans un article déjà existant ou alors ouvrir une galerie dans le chapitre XX, je serai alors informé de tout ce que tu auras pu ajouter ! Ceci dit, en principe je regarde systématiquement toutes les images qui apparaissent dans Commons, je récupère les liens de celles qui m'intéressent et je les mets en quarantaine, de façon que si elles doivent être supprimées, je ne construise pas tout un chapitre autour d'elles.

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN 17:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to this edit

If the term fricional force is incorrect, what is the correct one? The correct term is friction force. See w:frictional force and read the first 2 paragraphs. Hope that clarifies. -- penubag 00:00, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The drawing is false because the forces represents the case where there is no friction at all ! See the french wikibook about friction and wear : tribologie Jean-Jacques MILAN 10:04, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There is friction in the drawing because I made it have some, the force of gravity is larger than the force of friction therefore producing a downward motion (the vector arrows aren't drawn to scale). -- penubag 09:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Of course not, the «friction force» is mixing the effects of friction with the effecte of the slope. This drawing is very bad !! Jean-Jacques MILAN 10:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of the picture is to demonstrate the forces acted upon an object sliding down an incline. It is perfectly fine to mix friction with the Fg from the incline. Maybe you'll like this picture better though. -- penubag 06:55, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You demonstrate nothing with this picture which is worse than before. First you need to study correctly the problem ! Jean-Jacques MILAN 08:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a problem, please explain clearly, thanks -- penubag 08:57, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please forgive my bad english. In all mechanical problems you have to answer two questions :

by what the object I study is attracted or repelled ?
- the weight,
with what the object is in contact ?
- the action that permit the block to go up,
- the sum of the actions applied by the flat running track (of course not perpendicular to the track).

There is nothing else but these three forces. In this case the static equilibrium makes that they are in the same plane, cut themselves in the same point and have a null sum.

Jean-Jacques MILAN 09:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's okay, English is a hard, stupid language. But, those problems you stated above are not really a problem. You say that I should include those in my image, but that would just clutter it. That information belongs in an article, where it is. -- penubag 07:32, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fixation plaque isostatique.svg

J'étais en train de me dire exactement la même chose et je met de suite une nouvelle image.

Merci de ta vigilance.

Cdang 13:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

En fait je regarde systématiquement toutes les images qui sortent pour inclure celles qui m'intéressent dans mes livres. Par ailleurs j'ai tout un bouquin sur la théorie des mécanismes mais le temps me manque pour le mettre en ligne, d'autant que c'est bourré de formules, de matrices, de torseurs et tutti quanti ! C'est un sujet sur lequel beaucoup de livres scolaires racontent les pires âneries recopiées, comme d'habitude, de l'un à l'autre !!!

Pour ton positionnement sur un plan il faut trois appuis ponctuels dont les normales ne sont pas concourantes ou bien une linéaire annulaire plus un appui ponctuel dont la normale ne passe pas par le centre de la linéaire annulaire ("centrage", mot mal choisi, plus "locating").

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN 20:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Toutafé, mais il s'agit là d'exemples de vulgarisation pour des non mécaniciens, je veux donc utiliser des exemples de la vie courante, et dans la vie courante ou est toujours en hyperstatique ; le problème est donc de trouver des exemples « pas trop hyperstatiques ». Si tu as des suggestions…

Je pense faire des choses plus précises avec l'article w:fr:Mise en position et maintien isostatiques d'une pièce (problème de la surface de référence dans un étau), où là on peut aborder des configurations se rapprochant de l'isostatisme.

Cdang 07:59, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Marteau Cayere 01.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Marteau Cayere 01.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Samulili 07:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Remplacement d'une liaison linéaire annulaire 2.svg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot (talk) 00:08, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Alsaphot_Voltaflash.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Alsaphot_Voltaflash.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Herr Kriss (talk) 20:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, en fait il manque à cette image les informations permettant d'en identifier l'auteur : est-ce bien toi ? Si c'est le cas, il suffirait d'ajouter la mention "Source : Own work/travail personnel" sur la page de description de l'image...

Merci d'avance,

bien cordialement,

-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 15:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images à vérifier/infos manquantes

Bonjour, en parcourant petit à petit l'impressionnante liste des images que tu as importées sur Commons [1] (et je suis encore loin de les avoir toutes vues), j'ai remarqué que certaines ont des infos manquantes : pour ce qui est des catégories, j'arrive globalement à faire le nécessaire, mais pour certaines tu es irremplaçable pour préciser la source (et parfois l'auteur).
Par exemple, j'imagine que pour les photos d'insectes tu es chaque fois l'auteur, mais ce n'est parfois pas clair, aussi je préfèrerais que tu le précises toi-même dans les images concernées.
Voici enfin quelques images sur lesquelles j'ai des questions plus précises :

Image:Hasselblad_500_EL.jpg ne mentionne ni source ni auteur,
Image:Kodak Retina Reflex III vers 1961.png, Image:Kodak Retina Automatic III vers 1961.png, Image:Kodak Retina Automatic II vers 1961.png, Image:Kodak Retinette 1B vers 1961.png et Image:Kodak Retina Automatic I vers 1961.png ressemblent à des scans de documents imprimés mais ne mentionnent pas de source,
Image:Praktica B 200 1981.jpg, Image:Heinrich Geissler.jpg et Image:Ptolemee.jpg : la licence PD est obsolète, il faudrait justifier la raison pour laquelle tu estimes que ces images sont dans le domaine public en utilisant un des modèles indiqués dans leurs pages de description.

En te remerciant d'avance pour ton aide et aussi pour tout le temps que tu passes sur Wikilivres,
Bien cordialement,
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 10:22, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,

Les images d'appareils sont tirées de mon propre cours de photo et remontent à 35 ou 40 ans, voire plus. Les portraits de Geissler et de Ptolémée datent de beaucoup plus de 70 ans.

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 20:08, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour ces précisions.

Je comprends bien que le cours était de toi, mais est-ce le cas pour les photos qu'il contient ? C'est un peu comme si tu me disais : le wikilivre de photographie est de moi, sans me préciser l'origine des photos qu'il contient : certaines sont des photos que tu as prises personnellement, d'autres sont des photos importées de Commons. Ces dernières ont un auteur qu'il convient d'identifier ; de la même façon, pour celles que tu avais intégrées à ton cours à l'époque, certaines pourraient tout à fait provenir d'une photocopie que tu aurais faite de leur représentation sur le manuel, etc. Dans ce dernier cas, elles ne sont sans doute pas libre de droits à ce jour :(

Pour les portraits, ce que tu me dis est embêtant, parce que 70 ans n'est pas une durée suffisante pour considérer qu'une oeuvre est tombée dans le domaine public. Par exemple, si un auteur d'une image survit ne serait-ce que 20 ans après l'avoir créée, il faut attendre 90 ans à compter de la date de la publication (en fait, on compte 70 ans à partir de la mort de l'auteur). Donc l'idéal serait de connaitre l'auteur, pour être en mesure de calculer si les 70 ans sont bien écoulés depuis sa mort. Autre possibilité : que tu indiques la source de l'image, pour qu'on puisse voir si elle n'a pas été placée sous une licence directement exploitable par Commons.

Encore merci pour ton aide,

bien cordialement,

-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 07:56, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,

Depuis le temps, j'ai oublié l'origine exacte de ces photos. Aucune en tous cas n'a été prise dans un livre ; il s'agissait uniquement de documents publicitaires ou industriels, généralement fournis gracieusement par les entreprises ou les importateurs, de toute manière ravis que l'on parle de leurs produits. Il y a 35 ans ou plus, il était très facile de joindre au téléphone les personnes qualifiées lorsque l'on souhaitait un renseignement. Aujourd'hui ... L'auteur de la représentation de Ptolémée n'a sans doute plus mal aux dents depuis plusieurs siècles. Pour Geissler, je ne sais pas. Par ailleurs, certaines des illustrations comme celle du flash Alsaphot proviennent d'entreprises qui ont disparu depuis des lustres et bien malin celui qui pourrait retrouver leurs auteurs !!!

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 00:08, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photos d'appareils photos

Bonjour Jean-Jacques,

Je ne suis pas Bordelais mais... alsacien ! Il se trouve que j'aime beaucoup la voile et les navires, c'est un de mes centres d'intérêt principaux sur Wikipédia, j'avais donc demandé des autorisations pour utiliser des photos, le port de Bordeaux avait répondu positivement...

Pour mes photos, je reste un grand débutant ! Pour prendre en photo ces appareils, j'ai utilisé les moyens du bord : faute de studio, la cuisine de mes parents où la lumière est suffisamment diffuse, mais hélas très jaune. J'avais réglé la balance des blancs sur "lumière tungstène" mais ça n'a pas toujours bien marché, et quand j'essayais de la régler manuellement ça variait d'une photo à l'autre. Pour être honnête, c'est une des premières fois que je faisais de la photo d'objets, et je me dépatouillais déjà avec la profondeur de champ, les ombres, les poses longues...

J'ai demandé à l'atelier graphique de venir filer un coup de main pour corriger la balance des blancs et éventuellement détourer les photos sur User:Korrigan/Images à détourer. Malheureusement je n'ai pas shooté en RAW...

Merci de tes commentaires, le Korrigan →bla 08:09, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pas de souci, si tu en as d'autres, il y a encore plein d'illustrations manquantes dans le livre. Pour la dominante, il aurait sans doute fallu que tu passes en mode "blanc mesuré". Pour le reste, si par hasard tu as l'occasion de passer par Bordeaux, fais-moi signe, de préférence à l'heure de l'apéro, je trouverai bien dans mes réserves un peu de révélateur écossais ou charentais !

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 23:51, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bien reçu :-) Je suis sur Coventry à présent, mais sait-on jamais ! De même pour toi si tu t'aventures dans ces eaux... le Korrigan →bla 08:22, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Jean-Jacques MILAN!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:58, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ressort à lame théorique d'egale resistance.png is uncategorized since 11 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:58, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Abaque pour la détermination des ressorts hélicoïdaux.png is uncategorized since 11 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:58, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Lame d'égale résistance à épaisseur constante.png is uncategorized since 11 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:58, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Kodak ad 1888.GIF is uncategorized since 24 February 2009. BotMultichillT 06:09, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Kowa SETR.jpg is uncategorized since 29 June 2009.
Image:Miranda Laborec 02.jpg is uncategorized since 29 June 2009.
Image:Leucippe (portrait).jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Quais de Bordeaux noir.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Quais de Bordeaux a.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Eclairement par une seule source 1 a.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Optar 1.svg was uncategorized on 27 October 2009.
Image:Notion de document.svg was uncategorized on 11 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Pertinents-extraits.svg was uncategorized on 12 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Bande orangée unie sur dégradé gris.svg was uncategorized on 22 February 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Réflexion de divers types d'écrans de projection.svg was uncategorized on 22 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:06, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Angle de vision et coefficient de réflexion.svg was uncategorized on 22 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:06, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Schéma d'un écran perlé.svg was uncategorized on 22 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:06, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Vignettage dû à un pare-soleil inadapté.jpg was uncategorized on 5 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:34, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Vignettage.png was uncategorized on 6 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Bruit de fond numérique.jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:01, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Bruit de fond numérique inversé.jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:01, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Voile sur un film Kodak Royal X Pan.jpg was uncategorized on 31 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:01, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Plan incliné et escalier.svg was uncategorized on 14 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Photo numérique.jpg was uncategorized on 15 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:21, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:02140 - Toits à Gradignan 2.jpg was uncategorized on 15 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:21, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:02140 - Toits à Gradignan 1.jpg was uncategorized on 15 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:21, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Photo argentique.jpg was uncategorized on 15 February 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:21, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1

File:Acid Drinkers band 2.jpg

will soon be deleted, please remove from your user page DingirXul (talk) 16:49, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Praktica B 200 1981.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

Jodo (talk) 23:10, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ancien moulin.jpg

What is the exact location of this windmill - town / vilage? Mjroots (talk) 19:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Near Chassagne Montrachet, I'm not sure of the exact location. Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 20:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Augustin_Fresnel.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Augustin_Fresnel.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 12:11, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roger_Bacon.jpeg

File:Roger_Bacon.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 20:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cannnnnelures

Oups, merci (en plus j'ai mon GDI sur les genoux).

C'est vrai que toi, en canelés, tu connais autre chose que les Baillardran de la gare Montparnasse…

A+

Cdang (talk) 12:22, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bon, je crois qu'il y a prescription pour nos vieilles querelles. Si tu passes par Bordeaux fais-moi signe, je t'en ferai déguster de vrais ;-)) accompagnés d'un lubrifiant adéquat, c'est toujours très mauvais de tarauder à sec ! Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 13:40, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please help replace this outdated license

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperstatique !

Oui, mais justement je n'ai pas modélisé par des appuis plan mais par des sphère-plans. La surface théorique d'appui sur l'épaulement est bien un plan, mais l'épaulement n'est utilisé que comme butée, c'est donc bien le centrage long qui impose l'orientation ; idem pour la clavette.

En tous cas, c'est un montage classique (voir par exemple Liaison complète démontable p. 8), et j'ai demandé confirmation aux collègues pour le dessin.

Ou bien ?

Cdang (talk) 14:35, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

C'est évidemment un montage on ne peut plus classique mais qu'il ne faut à mon avis pas modéliser comme tu l'as fait car cela donne de fausses idées sur les problèmes bien réels qui se posent lorsque l'on veut réaliser correctement un tel assemblage. Sue l'arbre il n'y a pas de gros problème en général vu que le cylindre et le plan sont souvent réalisés sans démontage de la pièce ou avec des trous de centre fiables. Sur le moyeu il en va tout autrement, le plan d'appui et l'alésage étant généralement réalisés sur des machines différentes, de sorte que la portée ne peut pas être correctement assurée sur l'appui plan ou sur le pivot glissant.

Comme en fait le serrage plaque le moyeu sur l'épaulement, c'est souvent ce dernier, en raison de la présence de jeu entre les cylindres, et contrairement à ce que l'on pense généralement, qui oriente le moyeu.

Quant à la clavette, l'analyse mécanique complète est très compliquée et en fait c'est un organe que l'on ne sait pas calculer théoriquement. Il suffit de voir les cotes-conditions qu'il faut respecter pour un bon montage pour comprendre qu'il y a de l'hyperstaticité dans l'air.

Tout dépend bien sûr des conditions dans lesquelles tu comptes utiliser ce dessin et des explications qui l'accompagneront.

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 20:14, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Je suis bien conscient de tous ces problèmes, mais l'image est destinée à être intégrée à un cours de bac pro. Je ne sais pas si tu connais le « nouveau » bac pro (réforme de 1999), on ne leur demande plus de torseur, le plus compliqué est le cas de 3 forces parallèles, pour les forces concourantes ça s'arrête à la résolution graphique (voir par exemple ici). Malgré cela, j'essaie de faire passer des notions correspondant à leur activité (usinage pour les TU, montage-démontage pour les MEI), quitte à être trop simpliste donc « un peu faux ». Le contexte serait tout à fait différent pour un cours de DUT GMP (même le BTS CPI s'est aligné sur le bas…).

Pour l'usinage, j'en ai parlé au prof d'atelier, chez nous seule les rainures (clavette et écrou frein) sont faites à la fraiseuse, le reste est fait sur un tour (conventionnel ou num').

Je rajoute une remarque sur la complexité réelle sur la page de description et le cours. Merci pour tes remarques constructives.

Cordialement

Cdang (talk) 08:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Je comprend bien tes soucis ! En fait ce montage est beaucoup plus tordu encore que ce que l'on pourrait supposer. Lorsque l'on serre l'écrou, le bout d'arbre est tendu et son diamètre diminue, mais comme il est affaibli par la rainure, il subit en même temps une flexion. Le moyeu est en revanche comprimé ; s'il est mince et réalisé dans un matériau à bas module d'Young et fort coefficient de Poisson, style Alpax ou autre, il tend à s'écraser et le jeu dans le pivot glissant diminue. Si le moyeu est massif et réalisé en acier ou en fonte GS (très bas coefficient de Poisson), alors la diminution du diamètre de l'alésage est plus faible que celle du diamètre de l'arbre et le jeu augmente ... L'étude complète des montages hyperstatiques nécessite que l'on s'intéresse aux déformations, au moins du point de vue qualitatif, pour mettre en garde les élèves ou les étudiants sur les conséquences de leurs choix, et quitte à sortir un peu des limites du programme. Une chaise bancale à vide et qui ne l'est plus en charge est un bon exemple pour faire "sentir" le problème.

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 13:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, je fais fréquemment des petits détours qualitatifs hors sujet. Mais bon, déjà, avec des BTS CPI (des concepteurs bon sang !), la notion de déformée, est euh, comment dire, en fait on ne leur demande même pas de savoir lire un dessin en couleur, juste de savoir lire le haut de l'échelle (ils ont le résultat d'un calcul d'éléments finis et on leur demande le déplacement max, genre File:Tete revolver etr36 elements finis deplacement.png), alors avec des bac pro... Pffff )-:

Vivement la retraite.

Cordialement

Cdang (talk) 14:25, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Euh, pour revenir à « le plan d'appui et l'alésage étant généralement réalisés sur des machines différentes », j'avais mal lu, j'avais en tête les usinages sur l'arbre ; effectivement, la roue dentée et l'arbre ne sont pas réalisés avec les mêmes machines, tu as raison.

Cdang (talk) 07:29, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Demokrit.jpeg

File:Demokrit.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Diego Grez _{(previously MisterWiki)} ^{let's talk} 17:31, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Intersection cone sphere.svg

La nouvelle version est-elle correcte ?

(La prochaine fois, préviens-moi sur ma page de discussion, ça évitera d'attendre 4 ans avant que je ne repasse par hasard sur la page…).

Cdang (talk) 07:02, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,

Pour être clair, je suppose qu'il y a une vue de face, une vue de gauche et une vue de dessus. Il y a toujours un problème sur la vue de face ! Il faut considérer le niveau de plan auxiliaire horizontal qui correspond aux points où l'intersection traverse le contour apparent de la sphère. Au-dessus de ce plan, on voit apparaître en trait plein le dit contour apparent, et l'intersection est logiquement représentée en trait interrompu puisqu'elle est cachée par la sphère. En revanche, en-dessous, le contour apparent de la sphère disparaît, tandis que l'intersection que tu as représentée en trait interrompu devient visible, donc trait plein !

Amitiés. Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 18:50, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vu pour cete erreur (la même que celle que j'ai corrigé, mais ailleurs…). Je corrige ça lundi.

Merci.

Cdang (talk) 14:17, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ayest.

Cdang (talk) 16:03, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:UIF_0248.jpg

Hi! Thank you for identifying some of my images! For this one File:Chloromyia_formosa_001.jpg you asked for a location. The image has a GPS location, so you can see where it was made. The size is difficult. I should have noted when taking the picture. I will do that nex time. I tried to reconstruct the size with the lens and I get something like 5 to 8 mm. I hope this helps. Amada44 ^{talk to me} 08:34, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK You may rename this fly Chloromyia formosa ! Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 10:48, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thank you!! Amada44 ^{talk to me} 09:45, 16 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suspension Dubonnet

I don't quite understand this drawing, but this may be because I don't quite understand the système Dubonnet. Could you please explain it to me? Merci, Mr.choppers (talk) 17:45, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

this particular kind of spring is made of a bar and a tube. These two elements are welded at one end, at the other end they are free to rotate. Sorry for my poor english !!

Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 18:58, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Otto_Hahn.jpg

File:Otto_Hahn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Maidonian (talk) 00:28, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Chasseur_d'IMages_006.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Chasseur_d'IMages_006.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Chasseur_d'IMages_006.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin H. (talk) 00:08, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

C'est juste la couverture d'un magazine vendu dans les kiosques en 1977, je ne vois pas le problème !!! C'est d'autant plus malvenu que les couvertures des autres numéros n'ont, fort logiquement, fait l'objet d'aucune remarque. Il faut arrêter de faire du zèle à tort et à travers !!!!!!! Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 00:34, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Files on Commons must be public domain or freely licensed by the copyright holder. Commons:Critères d'inclusion#Licence libre ou domaine public. The photos are not public domain. Are you the photographer of this cover photos? --Martin H. (talk) 03:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cette image n'est pas la reproduction d'une œuvre photographique, mais juste le scan de la couverture d'un numéro ancien d'un magazine, ce qui est très différent. Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 17:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, Copyright on the photo and on the cover is not expired, this is not freely licensed nor public domain - {{Copyright violation}}. See Commons:À_propos_des_licences#France: La durée normale des droits d'auteur est de 70 ans décomptés à partir de la fin de l'année du décès de l'auteur, this also fully applies to this covers. --Martin H. (talk) 14:35, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Chasseur_d'Images_008.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Chasseur_d'Images_008.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Chasseur_d'Images_008.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Denniss (talk) 14:27, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

même réponse, il faut arrêter de faire du zèle inutilement ! Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 18:39, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Linhof_Kardan_bi-system.jpg

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Linhof_Kardan_bi-system.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Linhof_Kardan_bi-system.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

I have tagged this file either because it has no source whatsoever, or because the given source does not give enough information about its author or its date, making the copyright status of the file incertain, or maybe because the uploaded image is a derivative of one or several unsourced works. In any case, please don't ignore this message, contact me instead if you have more information or if you want to discuss the issue. Eusebius (talk) 12:15, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image was published with permission from an old advertising document in my own photographic course, about 35 years ago... Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 00:06, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Qui est l'auteur de la photographie d'origine ? Qui détient les droits, quelle est la source de la publication originale ? Il est fort probable que la permission qui vous a été donnée à l'origine d'utiliser cette photographie (si vous n'en êtes pas l'auteur) ne couvre pas la publication sous une licence libre permettant à quiconque d'utiliser l'oeuvre pour tout usage, incluant les travaux dérivés et les usages commerciaux. Plus d'informations sont nécessaires pour s'assurer que nous pouvons publier cette image. Merci d'avance ! Cordialement, --Eusebius (talk) 07:50, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,

La source devait être un feuillet publicitaire, le reste est perdu dans la nuit des temps. Il ne s'agit évidemment pas d'une œuvre d'art, mais d'un simple document probablement impossible à retrouver, même chez Linhof. La reproduction faite au début des années 1970 est par ailleurs très mauvaise, l'image est minuscule et je vois mal qui pourrait avoir l'idée d'en faire des travaux dérivés ou un usage commercial !

Cordialement, Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 00:00, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Là n'est pas le problème... Commons est une base de documents sous licence libre, et celui-là ne l'est pas. Comme il n'est pas sourcé, nous n'avons pas de moyen de remonter jusqu'aux ayants-droits pour obtenir une permission. En termes de droits d'auteur, la "nuit des temps" est malheureusement bien plus ancienne que les années 70 : cette photographie ne pourrait être dans le domaine public que si son auteur était décédé avant 1940... Date antérieure à la chambre représentée. Sauf surprise, l'illustration devra donc être retirée. Avant d'importer de nouveaux documents, je vous invite à lire attentivement cette page. Cordialement, --Eusebius (talk) 07:42, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 82da910ac9abd05c31486a3f1bc3fb5c

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:19, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flou et netteté

Bonjour,

vous utilisez cette image

pour expliquer les effets de bords, en disant que les lignes grises sont uniformes.

Malheureusement, elles ne le sont pas. Un examen attentif, zoomé, des lignes isolées montre que les bords sont gris 64 et le centre gris 54. Peut-être est ce du a la compression jpg ? Une image gif serait plus indiquée. Cordialement pem (talk) 08:33, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonsoir,

C'est parfaitement exact, je me suis fait avoir par la compression jpg ! Je vais y remédier rapidement.

Avec mes remerciements, Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 16:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Objectifs

Bonjour, Je vais créer les designs optiques des objectifs Canon. Voir ma page sur commons pour voir toutes celles que j'ai fait. --Alessio Facchin (talk) 12:40, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Distance orthoscopique01.jpg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 02:22, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:N2O3.png is disputed

Dispute notification

The chemical structure File:N2O3.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 04:10, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

cartes postales et tramways

Bonsoir,

J'ai intégré votre reproduction de carte postale File:ND 84 - DIJON - La Rue de la Liberté.JPG dans le wikilivre de photographie que je suis en train de rédiger depuis quelques années maintenant. Je serais heureux de vous voir collaborer à cet ouvrage !

En passant, la marque ND Phot est celle de l'éditeur Neurdein : b:fr:Photographie/Sociétés et Organisations/Éditeurs spécialisés/Neurdein.

Par ailleurs, mon petit-fils Yohann (9 ans), qui habite à L'Île-Saint-Denis, est passionné par les chemins de fer et les tramways, il a commencé la rédaction d'un wikilivre sur ce dernier sujet : b:fr:Technologie/Lignes et services de tramways/Prolongements et créations de lignes de tramways en Île-de-France.

Je pense que vous avez quelques centres d'intérêt en commun !

Amitiés, Jean-Jacques MILAN (d) 21:13, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Bonsoir,
Merci de votre message. Je me consacre essentiellement à wikipédia, et je ne connais pas le concept des wikibooks (déjà que je n'ai pas le temps de compléter les articles de tramways sur lesquels j'interviens...).
J'ai une une partie de ma collection de CPA ferroviaires sur commons, avec des titres structurés comme suit : éditeur numéro - ville - tire. La description commence habituellement par "Carte postale ancienne éditée par ND, n°". Une recherche rapide vous donnera par exemple :

File:ND 4024 - LES TRANSPORTS A PARIS - Tramway à traction électrique système Thomson Houston - Ligne de l'étoile à la Vilette.JPG
File:ND - MELUN - Le Pont-aux-Moulins.JPG
File:ND 290 - MONTIVILLIERS - L'Arrivée, rue du ....JPG
File:ND 118 - OLIVET - La Station des Tramways.JPG
File:ND 162 - SAINT-BRIEUC - Le Légué, la Vallée.JPG
File:ND 3897 - PARIS - La Place de la République.JPG
File:ND - Route de Nice à Monaco - La Baie d'Eze.jpg
File:ND 18 - Rouen - La Statue de Corneille et le Pont de Pierre.JPG
File:ND 71 - Ligne de Voiron à Saint-BERON - Passage aux gorges de Chailles.JPG
File:ND Barbier 58 - LE MANS - La Gare des Trams.JPG
File:ND 3888 - PARIS - Le Boulevard Saint-Martin, vue prise de la Place de la République.JPG
File:ND 19 - LYON - Le Pont Tilsit et le Coteau de Fourvières (Détail).JPG

et il doit y en avoir quelques dizaines encore. Elle peuvent sans doute compléter votre travail, même si elles risquent de donner une connotation très ferroviaire à cet éditeur pourtant généraliste. Dans votre texte, vous pourriez également mentionner que ND numérotait ses CPA par commune, ce qui fait qu'il y a de très nombreuses cartes n°1 ou n°2 chez ND, et qui rend difficile la création d'un catalogue général des cartes éditées par ND. Cordialement --Claude villetaneuse (talk) 18:27, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Loi de Stokes.svg

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:18, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Éditeurs de cartes postales

Bonsoir Jean-Jacques,

Comme vous me l'avez demandé, je viens de préciser les éditeurs des cartes postales anciennes que j'ai scanné.

Amicalement, Altona (talk) 21:45, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mention éditeur sur cartes postales anciennes

Bonjour,
Rep. courrier 17 mai
Je ne comprends pas L'UTILITE de mentionner l'éditeur de C.P. lors de la mise en ligne de ces documents. Il devait, à l'époque y avoir autant d'éditeurs que de communes (habitant, commerçant du lieu) ! Si cette information qui est imprimée au recto des C.P. a de l'intérêt pour vous, libre à vous de la reporter sur la fiche C.P. Pour ma part, je m'y refuse, les éditeurs de mes cartes postales étant de ma propre famille... D'autre part, la mise en ligne est fastidieuse, et ce n'est pas mon centre d'intérêt : les C.P. sont là uniquement pour illustrer des articles Wiki (et pour contrer certains commerçants qui les revendent allègrement).
Bien cordialement
--Aubry Gérard (talk) 09:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Normal croatie-lacs-plitvice-cascades-7.jpg

File:Normal croatie-lacs-plitvice-cascades-7.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 21:28, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Praktica B 200 1981.jpg

File:Praktica B 200 1981.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 21:38, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Georg Diancourt

Bonjour Jean-Jacques MILAN, je suis heureux que les photos de mon grand-père sont utilisés. Volontiers je peux essayer d'apporter une contribution à la Wikibook concernant Georg Diancourt. Malheureusement, mon français est très pauvre (google traducteur). Aussi, je ne sais pas comment les descriptions des photographes dans le Wikibook devraient examiner de manière appropriée. Par conséquent, je voudrais insérer mes premiers messages sur la page de discussion appropriée comme une suggestion et vous demander de transférer les pièces utilisables. Que sais-je de mon grand-père n'est pas beaucoup (il est mort quand j'avais 10 ans et il a été tiré loin). En outre, beaucoup est plus anecdote et ne s'applique pas à la Wikibook. Mais peut-être qu'il est un peu à l'utiliser. Je vais essayer de contribuer des photos de l'appareil photo de mon grand-père (il doit toujours exister). Cordialement --LoKiLeCh (talk) 21:29, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flou de bougé.jpg

File:Flou de bougé.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ies (talk) 16:22, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Appareil de Coulomb.jpg

File:Appareil de Coulomb.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:06, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ptolemee.jpg

I have recently nominated the files, Ptolemaeus.jpg, Ptolemee.jpg and Claudius Ptolemaeus.jpg for deletion because I was unable to verify their copyright status. One of these was uploaded by you. If you wish to contest its deletion please provide your reasons on the nomination page. David Wilson (talk · cont) 06:51, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Pochette de travaux photographiques Kodak (années 1950).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Pochette de travaux photographiques Kodak (années 1950).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Pochette de travaux photographiques Kodak (années 1950).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

太刻薄 (talk) 01:04, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:0 ressort energie elementaire.png

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:0 ressort energie elementaire.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:45, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Goerz Minicord.jpg

File:Goerz Minicord.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

El Grafo (talk) 14:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rami Rouhana

Bonjour Mr.Jean-Jacques I have found two pictures concerning Photoelasticity that were provided by you. I wanted to know if it would be possible that I use them in my study, I am a master student and doing research on polymer. I also wanted to know what are the tools you used to obtain this effect, i understand that you need a polarising filter, but how where you able to take a picture of a large object. Thank you

Hi Rami,

Please can you remember me the links to the pictures ?

Jean-Jacques MILAN (talk) 15:48, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photo-phylles 2017 invitation

Thank You @Jean-Jacques MILAN: I appreciate the invitation. I will try sending in some of my photos, hoping that the quality of them can match the demands of this prestigious exibition.–Jozefsu (talk) 17:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eurydema ornatum

Eurydema ornatum has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

47.151.26.64 19:29, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Bertram Bewi Boy.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, El Grafo (talk) 10:44, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Petri MF-1.jpg

File:Petri MF-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ubcule (talk) 21:25, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Erwin Schrodinger.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 07:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Frédéric Joliot-Curie.jpg

File:Frédéric Joliot-Curie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 10:51, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Jean-Jacques MILAN

Archives

flower unknown

Image Tagging Image:Hypergonar.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Tireuse Supercontact Volomat.jpg

Image Tagging Image:Projecteur SFOM 860.jpg

Photo sur la photo

Astrophoto II

Photos techniques

Reply to this edit

Image Tagging Image:Marteau Cayere 01.png

Image Tagging Image:Alsaphot_Voltaflash.png

Images à vérifier/infos manquantes

Photos d'appareils photos

Tip: Categorizing images

1

File source is not properly indicated: File:Augustin_Fresnel.jpg

Cannnnnelures

Please help replace this outdated license

Hyperstatique !

Suspension Dubonnet

File tagging File:Chasseur_d'IMages_006.jpg

File tagging File:Chasseur_d'Images_008.jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:Linhof_Kardan_bi-system.jpg

TUSC token 82da910ac9abd05c31486a3f1bc3fb5c

Notification about possible deletion

Flou et netteté

Objectifs

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:N2O3.png is disputed

cartes postales et tramways

Éditeurs de cartes postales

Mention éditeur sur cartes postales anciennes

Georg Diancourt

Notification about possible deletion

File tagging File:Pochette de travaux photographiques Kodak (années 1950).jpg

File source is not properly indicated: File:0 ressort energie elementaire.png

Rami Rouhana

Photo-phylles 2017 invitation

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Navigation menu

Search